C3D8I-Element in CalculiX

Dear CalculiX users,

the present implementation of the C3D8I-Element comes from Prof. Otto Bernhardi of the University of Applied Sciences of Karlsruhe, Germany. Now, he sent me an improved version, leading to better results especially for coarse meshes. After checking the implementation I plan to replace the present version of C3D8I by the new one, however, I would like to know whether people actually use this element, and whether there is serious objection to the replacement.

Best Greetings,


1 Like

Dear Dr Dhondt,

this type of element can be very useful, I often give it a try in various tests and comparisons. Here’s one such example: Elasto-plastic bending - elements, accuracy
I’ve also seen several other threads on this forum where people used C3D8I elements in their studies.

It would be great to have an improved version of these elements implemented in CalculiX.

Best regards,

1 Like

I haven’t been using linear elements. Even in your user manual it states that better results are obtained with quadratic elements. That being said, it never hurts to improve your element formulations. I can’t imagine anyone saying oh my god, please don’t make ‘something’ better. I like it worse.

1 Like

A picture = 1000 words


dear dr. Guido,

many researcher in my areas still prefer linear incompatible hex element (C3D8I) to be used to perform an analysis with contact and plasticity of multipart objects. so, it could be a benefit if an improved version of these type element being updates in CalculiX.

best regards,
Suyono Nt.

**edited : an example application and document references

1 Like

Hello Mr. Dohndt,

do you have and doubts or what is your concern about serious objection to the replacement?


1 Like