# \*too many cutbacks \*STATIC analysis NGLEOM = ON **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [November 9, 2021, 5:23am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/too-many-cutbacks-static-analysis-ngleom-on/779 "2021-11-09T05:23:29Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 12
**Author:** ![vicmw](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/6de8d8/32.png) [@vicmw](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/vicmw)\ **Post date:** [November 10, 2021, 6:10am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/too-many-cutbacks-static-analysis-ngleom-on/779/12 "2021-11-10T06:10:30Z")
OK. Yea certainly get linear working first. I can’t think of any other reason displacement would be zero everywhere else though. Could you show a zoomed in deformed view of the displaced face and its transition to the undeformed area? I don’t know what to expect but maybe some clues in there. It kind of looks like it hasn’t solved at all and the output is just the initial state. I wonder if PARDISO isn’t working or installed? Maybe don’t specify a solver or choose SPOOLES that should always be a fallback, I think. You can also keep isolating the problem by removing things until it becomes correct. That includes deleting half the mesh repeatedly. That’s what I do for totally mysterious problems when I don’t have a clue. --- _[View the full topic](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/too-many-cutbacks-static-analysis-ngleom-on/779)._