# \*PLASTIC tensile test

**URL:** <https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [June 15, 2023, 12:10pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707 "2023-06-15T12:10:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thodec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@thodec](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/thodec)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2023, 12:10pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/1 "2023-06-15T12:10:45Z")

</div>

Hello,

I try to simulate a tensile test, but I dont really get it how CalculiX deals with the \*PLASTIC card. I’ve plotted the stress strain curves how it should look like and how it does look with my ccx simulation (‘stress\_strain.png’). My input data for the material are points of the real curve (‘material\_input.png’). The curve I created with CalculiX data reaches a stress of 370 MPa and then remains almost constant. Maybe someone could explain how CalculiX handles with the input data.

And another thing is, that there are two critical points in my simulation (‘cgx\_output.png’). I expected maximum of stress only in the middle of the specimen…

 ![cgx_output](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/4/4c77fbc317fca6a300dfa41f0f51f6a3ba2b8b7a.png)  
 ![material_input](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/d/d41d259a1af3ead6d39d256fbb692e4cb79f68df.png)  
 ![stress_strain](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/9/9bcf2a62ab7b15b566df2629fcf098a0ae60a040.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Calc\_em](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/43a26b/32.png) [@Calc\_em](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/Calc_em)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2023, 12:17pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/2 "2023-06-15T12:17:30Z")

</div>

Check this example: [CalculiX-Examples/NonLinear/TensileTest at master · calculix/CalculiX-Examples · GitHub](https://github.com/calculix/CalculiX-Examples/tree/master/NonLinear/TensileTest)

You may need some imperfection to initiate necking properly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vicmw](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/6de8d8/32.png) [@vicmw](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/vicmw)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2023, 10:12pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/3 "2023-06-15T22:12:42Z")

</div>

Also, make sure the mesh is refined enough. Too coarse a mesh can cause the stress/strain to not match the input data as well as necking to be in the wrong place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MichaelPE](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9de0a6/32.png) [@MichaelPE](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/MichaelPE)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2023, 3:00am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/4 "2023-06-16T03:00:30Z")

</div>

The comma after 439 looks suspecious to me. Should be “.”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thodec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@thodec](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/thodec)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2023, 12:32pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/5 "2023-06-23T12:32:03Z")

</div>

Thank you all. Using the example of Calc\_em I got a good result.  
But there’s already a new problem. I tested simulations for different rectangular profiles and different displacements as loads. The only good result is with a profile of 4/12.5 and a displacement of 25% as load (see pictures). Why are the results so different? I’ve already tried using a fine mesh.  
 ![disp](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/6/6761f8b164831c0fd867854962b31057a92059cd.png)  
 ![profile](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/9/9e8ba65f51609e11efe4ce435242ec4dcb23e65a.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Disla](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/disla/32/3548_2.png) [@Disla](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/Disla)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2023, 2:02pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/6 "2023-06-23T14:02:31Z")

</div>

Advice: Each time you see Strain in a book, result, manual,…… ask your self ¿Which strain are you talking about? . Finite Element Analysis has many (more than 10) different Strain measures.

¿What does “displacement” of 25% means?.  
¿What does “strain” shown in your graph means?.  
¿What kind of strain are you providing below the \*PLASTIC card?  
¿What kind of strain are you reading in your results file?

Carefully read this post. Its mind opening.

> [@Deformation Plasticity. Eulerian strain](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/deformation-plasticity-eulerian-strain/1511):
>
> According to the manual Eulerian strain e is used for deformation plasticity. ¿Is that minus sign in the Eulerian Strain formula right? (formula 364 manual 2.20) I have a model in which a simple rectangular bar is stretched from 1m to 1.5m. According to the formula my Eulerian strain should be : E Euler= .5/1\*[1-.5/2]=.375 m/m But I’m obtaining CCX RESULT = .625 m/m which maybe is a coincidence but corresponds to ; E Euler= .5/1\*[1+.5/2]=.625 m/m ¿Could some developer check w…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thodec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@thodec](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/thodec)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2023, 2:57pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/7 "2023-06-23T14:57:16Z")

</div>

Sorry I should have written more details: The input under the \*PLASTIC card ist the plastic logarithmic strain and the Cauchy stress. The stress-strain points I used are from here: [https://ww3.cad.de/foren/ubb/uploads/saj/Spannungs-Dehnungs-DiagrammS235JR.pdf](https://ww3.cad.de/foren/ubb/uploads/saj/Spannungs-Dehnungs-DiagrammS235JR.pdf)

The stress and strain I’m reading in my results is the same.

As load I have converted ε = ΔL/L = 25 % in ΔL. So for a specimen length of 40 mm, I used a displacement of 10 mm (25%).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Disla](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/disla/32/3548_2.png) [@Disla](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/Disla)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2023, 6:04pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/8 "2023-06-23T18:04:57Z")

</div>

> [@thodec](#):
>
> The stress and strain I’m reading in my results is the same.

¿What does this sentence mean?.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thodec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@thodec](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/thodec)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2023, 6:48pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/9 "2023-06-23T18:48:48Z")

</div>

I meant I plotted the Mises Stress and the disp1 in load direction as CalculiX results and it should be the same as cauchy stress and logarithmic strain if I understood it right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Disla](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/disla/32/3548_2.png) [@Disla](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/Disla)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2023, 10:27pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/10 "2023-06-23T22:27:52Z")

</div>

> [@thodec](#):
>
> CalculiX results and it should be the same as cauchy stress and logarithmic strain

-Double Check in the manual. Do not asume output is the same measure as input.

 ![imagen](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/a/a050137bfeb6d99a687473d9ed5db1197a25498e.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thodec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@thodec](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/thodec)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2023, 12:20pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/12 "2023-06-24T12:20:51Z")

</div>

Sorry, it was late yesterday. Actually I plotted the logarithmic strain with the Cauchy stress in “test”. The other curves in the diagrams are representing the strain ε = ΔL/L (ΔL is the output of CalculiX/disp in direction 1, L=specimen length) and the Mises stress. In the first diagram I used different displacements as loads (disp25 means ε = ΔL/L = 0.25 → Input = 0.25_L → The specimen is pulled 0.25_L in direction 1).  
The second diagram shows the different profiles I used (4.0/12.5 → 4 mm/12.5 mm).  
I don’t think the error is in the plot, because the results for disp25 and 4.0/12.5 agree very well with the test.  
I’ll try to be more careful about what I post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Disla](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/disla/32/3548_2.png) [@Disla](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/Disla)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2023, 5:15pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/13 "2023-06-24T17:15:15Z")

</div>

> [@thodec](#):
>
> I plotted the logarithmic strain

> [@thodec](#):
>
> The other curves in the diagrams are representing the strain ε = ΔL/L

Seems like you are comparing two different things.

![imagen](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/8/86294300756f2f557abf7f2e69fd0ede0ba483f8.png)

 ![imagen](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/5/5458c1346d97d319d9cd6ba9a0a14d8b96690811.png)  
 ![imagen](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/4/4c1980834875bc026e86322b412262944bdb57a9.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thodec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@thodec](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/thodec)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2023, 8:58am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/14 "2023-06-26T08:58:07Z")

</div>

Thank you @Disla. I’ve plotted the enginieering stress-strain curves: The results for different load inputs look good.

 ![eng_stress_strain_disp](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/4/45b9bd836cd9c519deb390a156d0623f41b1e477.png)

But the different profiles still do different results. After reaching the necking smaller profiles ensure that the stresses drop. Is it maybe because of the hardening of CalculiX? I didn’t define any hardening parameter.

 ![eng_stress_strain](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/c/c72e2f43d3500f4637c553858c6aa5c92114ae80.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Disla](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/disla/32/3548_2.png) [@Disla](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/Disla)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2023, 9:24am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/15 "2023-06-26T09:24:17Z")

</div>

¿Is the necking more noticeable in the smaller profiles?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thodec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@thodec](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/thodec)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2023, 10:02am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/16 "2023-06-26T10:02:52Z")

</div>

Yes, it is.

 ![deform](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/2X/a/a1aff4ed5e76b7de0cc4cc46626ad81d23dacad6.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Disla](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/disla/32/3548_2.png) [@Disla](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/Disla)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2023, 1:14pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/plastic-tensile-test/1707/17 "2023-06-26T13:14:02Z")

</div>

They all go worst after necking and you only plot up to 25%…mmmh  
¿Are you measuring the Strain or are you linearly interpolating according to the time step?

EDIT: Sorry the question is not properly formulated.

¿Have you request ccx to compute for you the Strain or are you linearly interpolating according to the imposed displacement and time step?
