# Missing element US3

**URL:** <https://calculix.discourse.group/t/missing-element-us3/924>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [December 27, 2021, 12:32am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/missing-element-us3/924 "2021-12-27T00:32:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xyont](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/xyont/32/3553_2.png) [@xyont](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/xyont)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2022, 11:03pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/missing-element-us3/924/3 "2022-02-10T23:03:19Z")

</div>

the behavior also the same as user beam element, seems it does not yet supported by CGX.

 ![2022-02-11 05_52_04-usrbeam.inp - SciTE](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/1X/6c51f4012edc907e96d99e91f7dbbe8a490f7b06.png)

\*\*edited  
may i corrected, finally i found it how to be working. thanks Guido for implement the improved version of classical shell element, also for some example files at the webs.

or, may also thanks to another. did Gil Rama at MTU Aero Engines (et al) contributed directly to CalculiX?

 ![2022-02-11 06_38_59-us3test.inp - SciTE](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/calculix/original/1X/06c9aaabbc721fd22fa79d93e96dff961030354f.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/missing-element-us3/924)._
