# Getting CalculiX v2.19 in to Debian experimental/unstable

**URL:** <https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [March 30, 2022, 3:59pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058 "2022-03-30T15:59:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![luzpaz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/51bf81/32.png) [@luzpaz](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/luzpaz)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2022, 3:59pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/1 "2022-03-30T15:59:48Z")

</div>

Hello CalculiX community. Was wondering if anyone was interested in helping to get CalculiX more homegenized in the opensource package ecosystem. Currently this is the status of how it’s doing

[![Packaging status](https://repology.org/badge/vertical-allrepos/calculix-ccx.svg)](https://repology.org/project/calculix-ccx/versions)

The clincher is that if we get it in to Debian experimental/unstable, it will propagate through all the derivative distros (which includes as you know Ubuntu)

Here is the Debian Science maintainer git repo for calculix-ccx: [Debian Science Team / calculix-ccx · GitLab](https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/calculix-ccx/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![luzpaz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/51bf81/32.png) [@luzpaz](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/luzpaz)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2022, 2:11am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/2 "2022-04-02T02:11:09Z")

</div>

Anyone in this forum know of packagers in the Debian Science Team ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![luzpaz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/51bf81/32.png) [@luzpaz](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/luzpaz)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2022, 11:49am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/3 "2022-04-05T11:49:28Z")

</div>

I’m planing to email the debian science team mailing list. If there is anyone here that is interested to express their solidarity with the request that would be appreciated. I’ll post the link soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![luzpaz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/51bf81/32.png) [@luzpaz](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/luzpaz)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2022, 1:28pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/4 "2022-04-13T13:28:10Z")

</div>

Good news: I contacted a Debian Science Maintainer who has bumped the package with a v2.19 update that is pending ([Debian Package Tracker](https://tracker.debian.org/news/1318161/accepted-calculix-ccx-219-1-source-into-unstable/))

See [Calculix is currently at 2.19 why doesn't the repo reflect that? · Issue #4 · calculix/ccx · GitHub](https://github.com/calculix/ccx/issues/4#issuecomment-1098027487)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![luzpaz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/51bf81/32.png) [@luzpaz](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/luzpaz)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2022, 10:39pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/5 "2022-04-13T22:39:20Z")

</div>

Mission accomplished. CalculiX-ccx v2.19 is in Debian experimental 🥳

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Disla](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/disla/32/3548_2.png) [@Disla](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/Disla)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2022, 11:00pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/6 "2022-04-13T23:00:38Z")

</div>

👏 👌

Thank you very much Luzpaz

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![feacluster](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/calculix.discourse.group/feacluster/32/394_2.png) [@feacluster](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/feacluster)\
**Post date:** [April 18, 2022, 2:15pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/7 "2022-04-18T14:15:18Z")

</div>

Great! Is it possible to add the executable with the Pardiso solver? You can download that from here:

[https://www.feacluster.com/calculix.php#3](https://www.feacluster.com/calculix.php#3)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![luzpaz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/51bf81/32.png) [@luzpaz](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/luzpaz)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2022, 9:05pm UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/8 "2022-06-27T21:05:56Z")

</div>

> [@feacluster](#):
>
> Great! Is it possible to add the executable with the Pardiso solver?

Is this available elsewhere in the package ecosystem?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carlomontec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7c8e57/32.png) [@carlomontec](https://calculix.discourse.group/u/carlomontec)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2022, 11:07am UTC](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/getting-calculix-v2-19-in-to-debian-experimental-unstable/1058/9 "2022-07-01T11:07:47Z")

</div>

Pardiso is not open source, unfortunately. [https://pardiso-project.org/](https://pardiso-project.org/)

Intel has a version which is free to use, but still not open source: [PARDISO\* - Parallel Direct Sparse Solver Interface](https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/onemkl-developer-reference-c/top/sparse-solver-routines/onemkl-pardiso-parallel-direct-sparse-solver-iface.html)
